Free Resources for Beginning Worship Leaders.

In the summer of 2012 I joined the worship band for my church’s youth group with absolutely no knowledge of how to lead a congregation or a team. Our youth band had an almost complete turnover of…

Smartphone

独家优惠奖金 100% 高达 1 BTC + 180 免费旋转




What can a cognitive psychologist do in a hackathon?

Why did it matter?

What did we want to advocate?

What did I learn from this experience?

I learned that my research and communication skills have a lot to offer in solving real-world challenges. I saw Stéphane’s message on the team-building channel. He explained his mission as an organizer of a community garden in Montreal, and I pitched some ideas of how I might be able to contribute using my skills as a scientist. Voila — a team is formed. Thanks to my academic training, I was able to quickly assess the situation, propose a solution, skim scholarly research, and create content for our deliverable/pitch. This process felt like a breeze as I am used to high-level thinking and analytical thinking. I believe that there are many forms for scientists or scholars to engage in public matters with their skills beyond their subject expertise. This hackathon experience strengthens this belief.

As cliché as it sounds, I also learned that teamwork is critical. While I focused on generating content based on my research, Stéphane, whose day job is a Marketing Director, built a full website from scratch. I saw in real-time how he edited the pitch presentation slides and what he considered to hit the content points. What Stéphane achieved in that timeframe is incredible. I would not have done any better. He seemed to think likewise about what I have put on the table. This experience mirrors (at least what I believe) real-world collaboration works: collaboration should be fast and efficient where everyone’s contribution is recognized, and everyone gets to grow from it.

This hackathon also broadened my view on collaboration. I used to think that cooperation requires face-to-face communication, be it virtual or physical. With Stephane, we worked together over instant messenger (Slack) and online collaborative tools (Google Doc and Google Slides) without having seen each other’s faces or heard each other’s voices once for the most part. It’s only in the last hour we finally ‘met’ each other when we videoconference via Zoom to record our pitch. Working toward a common goal does not require us to be best friends with each other when we trust each other when we have a common interest. I find this collaborative experience incredibly authentic.

What would I have done differently?

Having juggled multiple projects and working with different people, I have come to quickly notice that we were missing some talents on our team. At least an additional team member could have helped with some of the following: conceptualizing the pitch, editing, designing info-graphic. Mainly because this project directly relates to policy-making, I would have loved to collaborate with people with experience interacting with policy-makers/politicians and people with experience writing briefing notes. Translating our project into French would have allowed us to reach a broader audience. These are some ideas to improve this project to have a more significant impact if I were to lead this project with more than 48 hours to plan and execute.

I also reflected on how I found it challenging to find my team and continue to stay engaged with the hackathon. The initial team-building period of this hackathon was stressful and inefficient to me. There seemed to be too many people saying things on the team-building channel with too few people reading them. The problem of having too many people talking with few people listening and genuinely responding is that the noise is drowning out the signal (useful information and the call for help). I do not want to add to the noise. What I chose to do was to reply to two threads (one of them was Stéphane’s) only after carefully reading what they wanted to achieve and considering what I can offer based on their needs. Stéphane replied to me, and the other team ignored me. Only a 50% success rate of matching, so I can’t say if this works broadly, but it for sure worked for me this time. After finding my team, I rarely stayed on the main Slack channel because I wanted to concentrate on my work and extract relevant information. I wonder how my experience might change in a larger team, with a different focus (product/business case development vs. social issues), or with more interactions with other teams.

Take home

Add a comment

Related posts:

Our World Is Changed forever.

No countries are fighting for land, or resources, or power right now. Duh! It’s a capitalistic society; we don’t need to wage wars, we just have to own shares of the private entities that are mining…

Why a Pandemic Budget Is Necessary

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo often refers to fighting the coronavirus pandemic as a war. To go with that sentiment, New York Mayor Bill de Blasio announced his city would have to enact a “wartime”…

4 Ingredient Chocolate NICE Cream

Hey everyone! Today I have a delicious 4-ingredient NICE cream recipe for you! This recipe only requires a blender and a container so it is extremely quick and easy! Like many of my other recipes, it…